That's according to a Human Rights Watch report on the Israeli operation "Cast Lead," available at this link. Read it and weep.
Goldstone was right about Gaza
That's according to a Human Rights Watch report on the Israeli operation "Cast Lead," available at this link. Read it and weep.
Posted by Michael Balter
![The truth at last, or at least some of it, about Peter Rathjen, the U of Adelaide, the U of Melbourne, the U of Tasmania, etc. [Updated Sept 3, 2020: University of Melbourne "leader" finally speaks]](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NtaT0gwizlA/X0YoPAu3_nI/AAAAAAAAK0U/HMTuK0240ssttw105h75kgbWbSaXS2v4wCNcBGAsYHQ/w680/Rathjen.jpg)
My book about Neolithic Catalhoyuk in Turkey and the origins of civilization, the paperback edition. For more information about it, please visit MY WEB SITE
- Michael Balter
- I have been a working journalist for more than 40 years, beginning in Los Angeles as an investigative reporter and then in Paris as a travel, food, and science writer. For more than 20 years I have covered anthropology and archaeology writer for Science, Audubon, Scientific American, SAPIENS, and other publications. I have also covered sexual misconduct for The Verge, Scientific American, and others; I write about mental health, especially schizophrenia; and I engage in occasional media criticism. I returned to the USA in October 2017 after 30 years in Paris, and now live in the New York City area, where I currently teach journalism at City College of New York (I previously taught journalism at Boston University and New York University.) For more about me and what I do, copies of my articles, information about my book, and other goodies, please visit MY WEB SITE
3 Comments
HRW was the primary "supplier" of material to Goldstone (who was a member of HRW board, so clear conflict of interest there, but who counts, he was against Apratheid, he must be OK then, hey wait, he sent blacks to the gallows and had them wipped, wellm never mind, he's against Israel. so it's OK), and now both are singing the praise of each-other.
And Balter, ther is no need to weep. HRW was discredited by its own founder, by the bizzarre departure (with an "omerta" about the reasons) of its most senior "military expert" (Marc Garlasco who admitted killing 27 Afgan civilan deaths for each militant and that this was considered acceptable, but not for Israel with at the most 1:1) who was key to the reports against Israel and who admitted once that he was wrong in unreservedly blaming Israel(eg the Gaza Beach incident) only to be gagged and retracted by HRW.
I am, as you can see a supporters of Israel, but I do read the other side's argumentation, if you are a fairminded person, look at the other side without foaming at the mouth, for example, here: http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/despite_bias_and_scandals_human_rights_watch_halo_effect_continues_unlawful_destruction_in_gaza_
asherpat
you have zero comments on this post and yet, you do not publish mine, even though it had no profanities and even no unproven facts, innuendoes and allegations, so I have to conclude that you do not publish it becasue you simply can not stand opposite opinion.
What does it say about your convictions and their underlying truth?
asherpat